prowrestling.net
CONTACT US
ABOUT US
SEARCH SITE
SUBMIT NEWS
AD RATES
GO TO TORCH


--


ADD US TO YOUR RSS FEEDER

subscribe to this feed

AND BOOKMARK US

button3

ALSO SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DOTNET PODCAST
RSS FEED
or click button to choose popular RSS feeds such as Yahoo
subscribe to this feed


PRO WRESTLING ILLUSTRATED

CLICK IMAGE ABOVE TO LEARN ABOUT ORDERING PRO WRESTLING ILLUSTRATED


Dot Net Mailbag
Reader comments and editor response on the media’s coverage of recent deaths, TNA’s live show
Mar 26, 2008 - 12:51 PM


Send all feedback or mailbag questions to dotnetjason@gmail.com

I was watching Fox News and they did a big feature on Chase Tatum’s tragic death. Its always sad when someone passes away, but I was wondering why they didn't feature anything on Gary Hart's death? Why isn't his death important? Does this mean they will only mention a wrestling death if it has something to do with drugs?  

Thats not really fair to the fans or the industry. I doubt they would do this to another industry like basketball or acting. Just imagine the outrage this would get if they failed to mention the untimely passing of a great former NBA general manager, but then had no problem covering the death of a two-year CBA player that only appeared in a few games. This is not a knock on Tatum, but on the media. How do you as a journalist feel about this?    

Thanks for your time,
Robert

Powell replies: I haven’t seen the Tatum piece yet, but I’m not surprised it’s getting air time because of the painkiller connection. As far as Hart not being mentioned, this type of treatment is hardly limited to pro wrestling. Hall of Fame baseball players die and barely get mentioned on television, yet the media would jump all over the death of a minor league baseball player if his death were even remotely connected to steroids. Is it fair? Not to Hart, but pro wrestling has made itself an easy target for negative coverage.

***

Don’t know if you picked up on this or not, but Mike Tenay defiantly said to go to TNA’s website to vote for the Knockout’s Title match.  The kicker is I went to vote this morning (Friday) and there is the tiniest of disclaimers (if you actually stumble your way into the Live Impact page) that says the voting starts at 9 p.m. (ET) the  day of the show. How dumb is that? Just thought I’d throw that at you in case you hadn’t seen it yet.
 
Sam Robinson

Powell replies: Yes, that does seem foolish. I’m not sure why they’re waiting until the show starts to launch the voting since you’d think they’d want to create as much traffic as possible, but maybe there’s a method to their madness that I’m not aware of. If nothing else, I guess it’s encouraging to see them use Impact to drive traffic to their website. Now if only they would do away with those lame in-character interviews

***

I don't understand why TNA needs to endlessly hype their live show. This is exactly what's wrong with wrestling today. Too much is given away on free TV. The WrestleMania Rewind, Raw going three hours every 3-4 months, etc. TNA doesn't need to pull out the hyperbole and hype it as the biggest show of the year when they have a pay-per-view three weeks later. Taking the focus off of that for a 0.1 increase in ratings is completely pointless in the long run. What say you?

Rafael De La Rosa

Powell’s POV: First off, I want to point out that Rafael sent this letter before TNA started hyping the live Impact. His letter regards comments I’ve made about the lack of hype that TNA has given the show. I respectfully disagree, though, that TNA shouldn’t make a big fuss over the show.

If you’re going to go live in hopes of persuading the network to give you future live shows, then you should do everything within reason to pop a rating to convince them that it’s worth the extra production costs. I’m not suggesting that TNA give away all of their top matches and angles, but what’s the point of going live if you don’t make an effort to draw a better than average rating?


BOOKMARK DOT NET AND ADD US TO YOUR RSS
button
subscribe to this feed

HELP DOT NET: TAKE OUR ADVERTISER DEMO SURVEY

CLICK TO RETURN TO MAIN LISTING

OR SELECT A LINK BELOW FROM THIS CATEGORY

Dot Net Mailbag
Latest Twelve Articles
Round Two of Dot Net reader feedback to Twilling's "Wrestling is Fake" blog
Readers respond to Twilling's "What to tell people that say professional wrestling is fake" blog
Reader questions and editor responses regarding Shane McMahon, Triple H, John Cena, Jeff Hardy, Mr. Kennedy
Reader comments and editor feedback on Hulk Hogan's appearance on "Larry King Live"
Dot Net reader comments (and editor response) on Monday's Raw, Bryan Danielson's WWE appearance, and Sunday's TNA Slammiversary pay-per-view
A news reporter explains why Nick Hogan's audio recordings were released, reader criticizes Dot Net for being too hard on the Hogans




DOT NET MEMBERS LOG-IN
Username:
Password:

VOTE IN OUR LATEST POLL
Which act should TNA be most concerned with re-signing (assuming they haven't done so already)?
Kevin Nash.
Sting.
Christian Cage.
Team 3D.
Tomko.
Awesome Kong.
  

SELECT ANOTHER ARTICLE
BY CATEGORY BELOW...
(or click here to return to Main Listing)


LATEST NEWS UPDATES

LATEST PPV & TV REPORTS

LATEST VIEWPOINTS

LATEST PRODUCT REVIEWS



BACK TO HOME PAGE
| CONTACT US | SUBMIT NEWS | ABOUT US | VISIT PWTORCH.COM | INFO ON OUR AD RATES

© 2008 LAST ROW MEDIA LLC. • All rights reserved.