The following comments regarding the TNA Bound For Glory pay-per-view were posted last night in the Dot Net Members' Forum. You can gain instant access the forum and get all the other perks of membership by becoming a member for only $5 per month. For more information, visit the Dot Net Members' Signup Page.

-Dot Net Member C.S. writes: "Putting Jeff Jarrett and Sting over at the expense of Kurt Angle and Samoa Joe respectively?! Really... What the f---? I can almost understand the Jarrett win, even if I disagree with it, but Sting has no business beating Joe in 2008. Thank God I saved my money.

-Dot Net Member TGladden added: "I was so fearful of this. I think Sting has a no jobbing clause in his contract in regards to Bound for Glory. He is now 3-0 at Bound for Glory and in title matches at Bound for Glory. The Jarrett match should have gone like Jason (Powell) wrote in his blog, but I can understand Jarrett wanting to pick up the victory and it did require the assistance of Mick Foley.

-Dot Net member Duffman writes: "Kind of like Undertaker, who is perfect at WrestleMania and has won a world title at the last two WrestleManias. Sting is perfect at BFG and has won the TNA Title at the last three Bound For Glory pay-per-views. Coincidence?

-Dot Net Member GTS 1303 responds: "I was just about to point this out. Booker T went over A.J. Styles and Christian—guys they could be building the whole company around. I'm so fed up with TNA I might just stop watching completely. Lately, I've only been catching about every other episode anyway.

Powell's POV: You don't have to be a member to share your thoughts on the pay-per-view. Send a paragraph or two of comments on the show to dotnetjason@gmail.com for a possible mailbag article.

RECOMMEND THIS ARTICLE: